Undecided Voters

A place for members to talk about things outside of Virgin Islands travel.
Post Reply
Pete (Mr. Marcia)
Posts: 1471
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 4:48 pm
Location: Madison, Wisconsin

Post by Pete (Mr. Marcia) »

C.G., One other thing I would factor into your decision is the composition of the Supreme Court. Stevens is, I believe, 88 years old. It is likely that the next President may appoint at least one Justice.

By raising this issue I am not inviting extensive arguments about Supreme Court rulings, etc. I simply am raising an additional issue that I believe an undecided voter should consider.
Wisconsin, smell the dairy air
California Girl

Post by California Girl »

I think you're right Pete. I've heard people say Obama would appoint Hillary. Is that possible?
Pete (Mr. Marcia)
Posts: 1471
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 4:48 pm
Location: Madison, Wisconsin

Post by Pete (Mr. Marcia) »

California Girl wrote:I think you're right Pete. I've heard people say Obama would appoint Hillary. Is that possible?
Possible? I guess. Likely? Not a chance. According to the latest edition of the ABA Journal, his leading contender is Diane Wood of the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals. She is a good judge, who I once had the pleasure of arguing before.
Wisconsin, smell the dairy air
California Girl

Post by California Girl »

Thanks Pete! I value your input! :D
User avatar
Lulu76
Posts: 2310
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 12:41 pm
Location: Tennessee

Post by Lulu76 »

I don't think there's anyway that he'd appoint Hillary.
Pete (Mr. Marcia)
Posts: 1471
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 4:48 pm
Location: Madison, Wisconsin

Post by Pete (Mr. Marcia) »

From the ABA Journal, discussing a possible Obama administration:

U.S. SUPREME COURT
Diane Wood
Currently: Judge, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Law school: Texas (1975)

Judge Wood reminds some of Justice Antonin Scalia; in her opinions, like his, seeds are often planted for future cases. A Clinton appointee to the appeals court, Wood is seen as one of the country’s smartest judges. She’s a liberal who has authored a fair amount of high-profile dissents in the conservative 7th Circuit. In 2002, one such case regarded an Indiana law mandating in-clinic counseling for wom­en seeking abortions. Bucking the majority, Wood wrote that the law was burdensome to women, particularly those in rural areas.

Wood clerked for Justice Harry Blackmun and practiced at Washington, D.C.’s Covington & Burling. She entered academia in 1980, first going to Georgetown Law Center and then to the University of Chicago, where she has been a member of the faculty since 1981. An expert on antitrust litigation, Wood served as a deputy assistant attorney general in the antitrust division of the Justice Department during the early years of the Clinton administration. She joined the 7th Circuit in 1995.
Wisconsin, smell the dairy air
User avatar
Lulu76
Posts: 2310
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 12:41 pm
Location: Tennessee

Post by Lulu76 »

She sounds pretty good to me. Thanks for your input, Pete. I appreciate it.

Did they share any thoughts on whom McCain might appoint?
Pete (Mr. Marcia)
Posts: 1471
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 4:48 pm
Location: Madison, Wisconsin

Post by Pete (Mr. Marcia) »

Yes. Here is her background, again from the ABA Journal:

U.S. SUPREME COURT
Lillian BeVier
Currently: Professor, University of Virginia Law School
Law school: Stanford (1965)

BeVier teaches constitutional law at the University of Virginia, and she’s vice chair of the Legal Services Corp. She was mentioned as a replacement for Justice O’Connor, but the nomination ultimately went to John G. Roberts Jr. In 1991, BeVier was nominated to the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals by the first President Bush, but the nomina­tion was shelved after his ’92 election defeat. BeVier has taught at Virginia since 1973 and was a member of the Rudolph Giuliani campaign’s justice advisory committee.
Wisconsin, smell the dairy air
California Girl

Post by California Girl »

Everybody's been so focused on other things, but no one's really said much about the Supreme Court or brought these two names up. I think it's important to know this information. Thanks so much, Pete!
Pete (Mr. Marcia)
Posts: 1471
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 4:48 pm
Location: Madison, Wisconsin

Post by Pete (Mr. Marcia) »

you're welcome
Wisconsin, smell the dairy air
DELETED

Post by DELETED »

DELETED
User avatar
linne
Posts: 1161
Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 4:25 pm
Location: Denmark

Post by linne »

Hi you undecided voter, CA girl!

I would be proud, if I was you. So many people do so much just to tell YOU where to place your vote.
People on the board really respect you :) :) :) .

I have just seen i TV how Danish children are going around to night to get candies. See! We try to be similar the Americans. Why can the Americans not sometimes try to be similar us :? ?


Linne
California Girl

Post by California Girl »

SJfromNJ wrote: I did bring this point up on another thread a long time ago.
Wow, I totally missed that!
SJfromNJ wrote:Anyone csn be appointed to the Supreme Court, you do not have to be a lawyer or a judge.

Ok, now I show my naivete... is that true? How can someone become a Supreme Court Justice without being either? That doesn't sound right!
pjayer
Posts: 1384
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:07 am

Post by pjayer »

California Girl wrote:Everybody's been so focused on other things, but no one's really said much about the Supreme Court or brought these two names up. I think it's important to know this information. Thanks so much, Pete!
That is a good question, CA. After all, Supreme Court Justices are appointed for life. Thanks for asking it.
When the end of the world comes, I want to be in Kentucky, because everything there happens 20 years after it happens anywhere else. – Mark Twain
California Girl

Post by California Girl »

pjayer wrote: After all, Supreme Court Justices are appointed for life. Thanks for asking it.
Can you just imagine how frustrated I'd be if it was President for life? Yikes! :shock: I don't even want to think about that! LOL! :lol:
Post Reply