Reduced Fines?

Travel discussion for St. John
Post Reply
User avatar
mnfun2bme
Posts: 562
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 5:26 pm
Location: Minneapolis, MN

Reduced Fines?

Post by mnfun2bme »

Image
User avatar
toes in the sand
Posts: 994
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:21 pm

Re: Reduced Fines?

Post by toes in the sand »

hmmmmmmm....................................
"got a drink in my hand and my toes in the sand"
poidog
Posts: 105
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 11:42 am
Location: STJ

Re: Reduced Fines?

Post by poidog »

"DPNR reduced the fine by $1,000 and subsequently extended the remittance due date. According to Jamal Nielsen, DPNR Media Relations Coordinator, “fines to Ingrao were reduced because he was charged for not having an Earth Change permit which he did obtain.”"

What shocks me is the land survey posted in the article and the amount of lot space was used... all of it! No setbacks, no % to land/structure adhered too. It infuriates me that we're building a home on STJ and we're following all the laws/zoning plus going above and beyond to protect our land and the surrounding area, and this guy has a piece of land we would all die for to protect and enjoy and he's just destroyed it, sad :(. I understand and support that inholding land is private land and can be done to it whatever within the scope of the law, however inholdings should be more closely watched and monitored during construction.
Follow our building blog @ Seas the Day Villa STJ
northerngal
Posts: 420
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 4:32 pm
Location: Michigan

Re: Reduced Fines?

Post by northerngal »

Sure is interesting to see how the rich get away with things that a regular person would be bound and flogged for.
Image
Post Reply